The REAL TRUTH about "the truth"
Life and Ministry of William Irvine
CHAPTERS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Chapter Index
Chapter 14
1917 - 1930
Revised Nov. 22, 2008
1917-20 Princess Victoria Professes
1923 - Dave Christie & Emily Wilson marry
1922-23, 1925 and 1926-27 Workers List for North America
1929: “The Cooneyites Or Go-Preachers - Their Doctrine” published
Jack Carroll & George Walker Feud
West Hanney Meeting & Statement - July, 1930
Chapter 14
1917 - 1930
As a little background, Princess Victoria was born July 6, 1868 at Marlborough House, England, She was the fourth (second daughter) of six children born to Edward VII, King of England and Princess Alexandra of Denmark, married March 10, 1863. Her full name was Princess Victoria Alexandra Olga Mary. The six children were:
1. Duke Albert Victor Christian
2. George V Windsor, (King of England)
3. Louise Victoria Alexandra
4. Victoria Alexandra Olga Mary
5. Maude Charlotte Mary
6. John Alexander
She was the only daughter in the family to
remain unmarried, and was very close to her brother, who became King
George
V, the grandfather of Queen Elizabeth II. With all her other
children
married and living abroad, the Princess’ mother wanted the Princess
close
at her side. Her mother died when the Princess was 57, and she was
finally
able to leave the Palace. She retired to a country estate, The
Coppins in
Iver, in Buckinghamshire, where she died on December 3, 1935, at
the age of 67.
In 1917, when the Princess was 49, she came in contact with a 2x2 maid named Daisy Bassett, who worked in the royal palace. “Daisy was in attendance to Lady Keppell, Lady-in-Waiting to Princess Victoria, and Sir Derek Keppell was Master of the Household, i.e. taking oversight of all comings, goings and doings at the Palace, etc…Daisy passed on her testimony to Lady Keppell, and from then on Princess Victoria was constantly asking questions, and showing her interest. She valued listening to Daisy's testimony until the Lord gave her a testimony of opening up the Way of Life to her. It was during those free three years that Princess Victoria made her choice.” ( Princess Victoria’s Contact with the Workers 1917-1920)
London, England: Reportedly, Princess Victoria sometimes went to Hyde Park in London in a carriage with drawn drapes to hear the workers speak at Speaker's Corner. In July, 2004, the Author walked in Hyde Park and took photographs of Speaker's Corner. It is located at the northeast corner of Hyde Park, where two streets meet. There is a single light post in the center of a large bare area where there are no trees or grass, where people can easily congregate. There is no raised platform for the speaker. [Click Here for Photo of Speakers Corner in Hyde Park]
Even today,
Speaker's Corner
is a traditional site of public speeches and debate, especially on Sunday
mornings. Speaker's Corner was created after an 1872 law made it legal
for a speaker to assemble a crowd and speak freely on any subject. By
the 19th century, it had become a popular place for people to meet and exercise
their right to free speech. Any person may turn up unannounced and talk
on almost any subject they wish, although they may be heckled by people holding
opposing views. Noted people as Karl Marx, Lenin, George Orwell and
William Morris have spoken there. Nobodies also speak there!
Surrounded by some of the world's busiest streets, Hyde Park is
London’s largest open space. At one and one-half miles long and
nearly one-half mile wide, Hyde Park is
630 acres. It is one of the four Royal Parks of London connected
to
each other in the center of London. The park is divided in two by the
Serpentine
Lake. It lies between the Bayswater Road on the North and Knightsbridge
on
the South, Park Lane on the East, and West Carriage Drive on the West.
The land now known as Hyde Park was acquired by Henry VIII in 1536 from
the
monks of Westminster Abbey, and was used primarily for the King's
hunting
grounds. In 1637, Hyde Park opened as London's first public park.
The
Serpentine, a large artificial lake was constructed in 1730.
Just outside of Hyde Park, at the northeast corner at the end of Oxford
Street, is Marble Arch.
It was originally built in 1827 as a gateway to Buckingham Palace, but
it
was too narrow for the state coach and was moved to its present
location
in 1851. It was designed by John Nash in 1828, based on the
triumphal
arch of Constantine in Rome, and is built of white Carrara
marble.
The Wellington Arch is on the southeast corner of the park
where exhibitions and galleries are open to visitors.
To the West is Kensington, where Queen Victoria built a monument to her husband Albert. At the south end of Hyde Park is Rotten Row, the famous riding track. The road is almost four miles long and is now used as a horse riding, cycling, rollerblading and jogging route. Hyde Park hosts many large events. It is also a popular place for jogging, swimming, rowing, picnicking and even horse riding. The Park has been the site for some famous rock concerts. At around 10:30 am every day the Household Cavalry can be observed riding through the park from Hyde Park Barracks to Buckingham Palace. On royal anniversaries and other important occasions a 41-gun salute is fired in Hyde Park, opposite the Dorchester Hotel in Park Lane.
Just outside Hyde Park at the junction of Edgware Road and Bayswater Road is a triangular plaque set in the road which marks the site of Tyburn Gallows, where public executions took place until 1783. These were supposed to act as a deterrent, but instead became a public entertainment.
Open-air preaching was a method often used by the early workers. Most towns had a recognized speaking place, where people congregated to hear speeches, preaching and be entertained. Remember, they didn't have radio or television then. A search for the term "open air" on this website will show about 40 references to the early workers using "open-air" preaching. Probably the most well known open-air speaking location is Speakers 'Corner in Hyde Park, London. A speaker would bring with him a stool, platform or soapbox and step up on it and begin to speak to the audience. The term "getting on your soapbox" may have originated from this practice. Like media programs today, some speakers spoke on particular evenings at a certain time. Willie Gill and Edward Cooney were speakers there.
The Princess had Daisy pass a letter to Ed Cooney, "the man of God." She also corresponded with sister workers, Maggie Patton, and Emily Ruddell for 3 years, (1917-1920) before the palace discovered it and tried to stop her. She used symbols rather than names in her letter to protect the people involved, and signed her letters "VW", which stood for Victoria, Princess of Wales. There are 17 of these letters on record. (See Princess Victoria's Contact with the Workers 1917-1920). The Princess never actually attended any meetings, and although she hoped to go to a convention in Ireland where she might not attract attention, this did not happen.
After Daisy was no longer able to sneak letters to her, and the workers could no longer communicate with her, the Princess reportedly wrote letters to the workers after she moved from the Palace to The Coppins. ( Princess Victoria's Contact with the Workers 1917-1920). P.S. wrote: “When Victoria wrote the last of these letters, she was leaving the palace to live at The Coppins, Iver, Buckinghamshire, which seemed to be her personal property. She wrote letters from there, but they appear to be lost. Daisy left the palace at the same time. These letters were written to Maggie Patton, a girl from Ireland that had been in the work some 12 years or so. Two letters from Daisy are also written to her. Victoria's mother, Alexandra, who was known for her kindness, gave Victoria permission to go to meetings, and she was expected to a convention in Ireland in 1919, which Lord Stamfordham put a stop to.” ( Princess Victoria's Contact with the Workers 1917-1920).
1922-23:
1922-23 Workers List for North and South
America: By 1923, just 20 years after the first three
workers stepped onto American soil in New York City, there were 475 workers
preaching in North and South America. That's a grown rate of 23.6
workers per year. Only 15 states were not shown on the Workers list: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Utah, Vermont. Alaska and Hawaii were not states at this time.
1923: Jack Carroll announces the marriage of his cousin Dave Christie to sister worker Emily Wilson from the platform of Miltown WA convention: "The reason I speak so freely and plainly about this subject today is because two workers came to this convention married, and wish me to make the fact known. I refer to David Christie and Emily Wilson. And while we may seriously question the wisdom of this step, and recognize that it means greater difficulties in their lives, and less liberty in the Gospel, we cannot make dishonorable what God has made "honorable"; and for this reason we speak no word of condemnation and attach no penalty. If there is to be condemnation or penalty, we leave this in the Lord's hands." In the years between 1922 and 1926 workers list 6 additional married workers couples were added to the Workers List. There were 6 married couples in on the 1922 list; and 12 married couples on the 1926 list.
1925: Workers List for the Americas shows 568 workers total, up 93 from 1922-23 List.
1926-27:
1926-27 Workers List for North and South
America: By 1927, 24 years after the first workers landed
in America, there were 622 workers preaching in North and South America, up 54 from the 1925 list. The increaswe could be due to new workers entering the work, or by workers arriving from other countries. In the four years between the two lists, the workers were busy
taking their gospel into eight (8) additional southern states (AL, AR, LA, MS,
NC, SC, TN) and Arizona. Only seven (7) states remained off the Workers list: Delaware, Nevada,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Utah, Utah, and some of these states
were probably combined with other states. Alaska and Hawaii were not yet states.
Workers Lists for this period of time for other parts of the world are
not available at this time.
1924: Warning Article Printed in Our Hope (a magazine
edited by Dr. Gabelein at the time)
about the Go-Preachers, in January, 1924, written by W. M. Rule, titled:
THE COONEYITES OR GO-PREACHERS -
A WARNING. This article portrayed the 2x2 group in an unfavorable
light. [NOTE: Some sources give the year as 1929, rather than 1924]
1929: A Warning Pamphlet about the Go-Preachers is Published. The article carried in Our Hope magazine was republished in booklet form by the Central Bible Truth Depot, London. It was titled: THE COONEYITES OR GO-PREACHERS AND THEIR DOCTRINE, and went through many printings. The pamphlet was distributed in various countries where the group had spread. This pamphlet was later reprinted as a chapter in the book: *Timely Warnings," 1917, the first book known to be published about cults which was compiled by W. C. Irvine, Loizeaux Brothers, Neptune, New Jersey, USA. The book was renamed: name="Heresies Expos"> Heresies Exposed, 1973 (29 printings; see Chapter: "The Cooneyites or Go-Preachers and Their Doctrines," Pp 73-78) ( Read Pamphlet). Some of the workers attempted to have it put out of circulation, but were unsuccessful. Doug Parker wrote:
“In the year 1929, the Central Bible Truth organisation published a pamphlet headed The Cooneyites or Go Preachers and Their Doctrine. This really exposed this movement, and was circulated in every country where the belief had been active. An endeavour was made by both John Hardie, in Australia, and Jack Carroll, in the U.S.A., to have it put out of circulation. Hardie, in the company of another since ex-communicated preacher, approached the Sydney publishers at 302 Pitt Street, in an effort to have it stopped, but without success. His amazing admissions while under cross-examination stress the point that Christ takes second place, as redemption can only result through John Hardie or the workers. He admitted that Matthew 10 was part of his commission and when questioned as to whether he thought that he and his fellow workers were the only ‘True Preachers,’ he answered. ‘He that gathereth not with us scattereth abroad.’ Contained in the report which gave striking proof of the correctness of the Cooneyite Pamphlet, is the following:--‘There is something very subtle about the way they speak of being saved by the blood. There is a 'master mind' behind all this. When questioned more closely on this point, Mr. Hardie became most evasive.'
"A very lengthy account of this conversation was forwarded on to Loixeaux Bros., New York, where Dr. A. G. Gabelein, whose name is mentioned in the preface of the Schofield Bible, had become most interested in the erroneous teaching of this NEW SECT. Dr. Gabelein, the then editor of ‘Our Hope,’ published the whole of the Cooneyite tract in his magazine. This provoked the hostilities of the “Cooneyite" leader in U.S.A., Jack Carroll, who on May 27th, 1929, wrote a very revealing letter to this man, and even resorted to lies in his efforts to have it put out of circulation.” (Spiritual Fraud by Doug Parker, pp 9-10).
Arthur McCoy, an Australian worker, was present when John Hardie tried to persuade the Sydney, Australia publishers, Christian Workers Depot, to stop printing and distributing the pamphlet: “Not long after my (Arthur McCoy) discharge from hospital John Hardie took me with him to the Christian Workers' Depot in Sydney for he tried to stop the printing of the booklet entitled 'The Cooneyites.' At once John told Mr Ardill the reason for the visit...John told him that there were fourteen lies in the booklet, and Mr Ardill assured him that they would certainly not publish anything that was not true. He picked up a pen, got one of the booklets and began to note in the margin anything John told him was not true. The main point objected to was that there was a 'central fund'." ( The Secret Sect by Doug & Helen Parker, p 42)
Read the pamphlet: The Cooneyites or Go-Preachers and Their Doctrine
JACK CARROLL & GEORGE WALKER FEUD:
The exact nature of the contention between these two leading American
workers is
not known to the writer. It started sometime before 1930,
however, their irreconcilable differences were not widely known, even among the workers.
Ron Campbell gave a clue in a comment about Jack Carroll he made in a letter to George Walker dated Oct. 20, 1952: "I believe you will understand this, being once a victim of his."
They were obviously men with very different personalities and styles of administration. Whether there was one certain incident or several incidents or simply the great difference in styles that brought the division is not known. One explanation given is that North America divided into two "administrations" over a difference of opinion regarding plans for dates and visitors for convention, and Jack along with others in the West decided they would make their own plans, instead of trying to coordinate everything continent-wide. Regardless of the reason, the workers are still dealing with the fallout from that division nearly a century later.
By the 1930's, the 2x2 group gradually became more and more list
oriented. Many different lists came into use: workers lists, convention lists, visitors lists, study lists, special meeting lists, etc. Maintaining and putting out these lists became the duty of the overseer. Apparently there was a conflict between George Walker and Jack Carroll over a convention visitors list, and the West decided to henceforth make their own "wee lists," as Willie Smiley referred to them. Willie left the impression that it was the convention planning that was one of the first rebel tendencies in the west. This is viewed by some as the time "when the west broke away from the east," although it is doubtful if this was interpreted as a 'split' at that time. This division had an effect on visiting workers at conventions, as well as worker exchanges in fields. Hind-sight might describe it as the beginning of a split that became more and more visible as different issues evolved.
In the era of World War II, George Walker made up letterhead for the
East coast using the name "Christian
Conventions Representing Assemblies of Christians Assuming This Name
Only," and used it for correspondence with the US
Government in securing the professing servicemen and workers
non-combatant status. The West coast soon followed suit,
and copied the format of Walker's letterhead, inserting the names of
their annual convention locations. There is also
a Christian Convention letterhead for the Central States.
As far as what the name means, the conventions represent local groups (assemblies) of Christians who take no other name except Christian.
The Conscientious Objector debate of the second world war created significant polarization.
Jack Carroll left it up to the individual whether or not they chose to
be a Conscientious Objector; while the men in George Walker's territory
were instructed to fill out papers for non-combatant status.
Both sides had a letter written on Christian Convention letterhead that
could be signed by a worker overseer and used to aid the men in
obtaining C.O. military status; however, not all the men were aware of
this. The author's father wasn't aware of it. See letters in TTT Photo Gallery.
One cause given for the feud that split the East and West USA is the radio. Reportedly, it was the Pacific War theater, and in particular the workers who were prisoners in the Philippines, that resulted in the radio being freely used among the friends and workers on the West coast. It has been reported that Jack Carroll also attempted to use the radio for advertising meetings and even to preach to the public. Some workers felt that it was not proper to use the radio because no one could see the 2 & 2 method of preaching, which meant there was "talk without proof of the walk." Their theology concluded that the blessing was on the feet of those who publish the glad tidings of peace and not in their mouth or words. Some believed that for awhile Jack Carroll fell into the hands of rich men and was carried away with their influence and ideas, to the point that George Walker considered cutting off the West coast from fellowship over the matter. A compromise of sorts was reached, and the outcome was that the radio was not used for sermons and advertising meetings, but was allowed to remain in the homes of the West coast friends. However, George Walker did not allow radios in the homes of the East coast friends. This taboo is observed even today in places in the Eastern USA, depending on the ruling worker their ministerial indoctrination source.
It is interesting that the feud or differences didn’t die with the demise of Jack and George. Their prejudices live on among the workers preaching in each of these men’s respective territories. This east/west conflict also leaves its trail in the foreign countries sponsored by the respective sides. In other words, the division lives on, and extends beyond American boundaries, long after the two original feuding workers are gone. One worker saddened by this described the current situation in the following terms:
“However, there was - and still is - a persistent aching. In my heart because of the rift that exists between the East and the West. If this truth we are a part of were a denomination, it would have been split in many ways long ago. But it isn't a denomination, and it is not divided. that way. The same seeds of the gospel are being sown, and the same fruit is being harvested in all areas of the world. I ask myself, "Why should the Great Divide of the Rockies come between God's people?” And why should Satan be allowed this advantage? This "thorn" may be more painful to some of us who have labored on both sides of those mountains, and have come to know and respect and love God's servants and His saints in all places. I am certain that God did not cause this rift, nor want it. And I am just as sure that He wants to heal it. Jesus' fervent prayer to God in John 17 has come to mind many times - especially vs. 21, "That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee..." also Paul's exhortation in Eph. 4:3 "Endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” And numerous places that speak of one Spirit, one mind, one accord, I so long to see that among us.” ( January 31, 1987 Letter by Lecil Sullivan)
Ralph Derkland wrote: “We have known for years that Jack Carroll and George Walker have been at ‘bitter ends’ with each other and for us to go to convention and hear Jack tell about the Catholic and the Orangeman that knew they were saved because at one time they hated each other but now they loved each other and some of us would wonder how come he preaches ‘love’ to us but he manifests ‘hate’ to George and vice-versa. Lest some of you doubt the truth of this, can you give any other answer as to why George has not been in Jack’s territory for over 28 years, as he has never been here since I decided. Friends, is this consistent with what Jesus taught?” ( 1957 Letter by Ralph Derkland)
“Now you may wonder if I STILL believe this is God’s true way corrupted — Yes, I see it clearly in the heart of God when He sent His Son to earth but the corruption sat in long before I had anticipated that it had, as in the beginning there were no leaders they all went out, came back together, prayed half the night getting the mind of God as to where to go next. THIS WAS THE WAY--UNCORRUPTED but long ago. Since, during these past months I see clearly WHY it got corrupted. The scriptures themselves tell the story. The fault lies right at the feet of the Christians, the same as it has always done. In the Old Testament the children of Israel wanted a king so they could be like the other nations round about them. This did not please God but they ‘prayed’ for a king so God answered their prayer and gave them what they prayed for. Why did this displease God? Because He solely wanted to be their Leader, but they couldn’t SEE God and they wanted a leader they could see. Jack and George could see this human weakness fifty years ago and saw their chance to take over the leadership in Israel and at present it looks as if they may wind up the same as Saul did but we sincerely hope and pray they will see their mistake and turn from it. One worker told us there HAD to be some sort of rule amongst us to keep things in order. I asked, And what is wrong with our heavenly Father, is He not STILL on the throne?" Another said, “If there was no one to tell us where to go, we might all want to go to the same place.” How silly. If they are controlled by God, would they all go to the same place? And if they are not controlled by God, they have no business in the work in the first place.” ( 1957 Letter by Ralph Derkland ).
1930, July 19-20: CONFERENCE AT WEST HANNEY, ENGLAND:
According
to Doug Parker, the W. Hanney conference was held: “Because of
this
difficulty (Distribution of the Cooneyite or Go-Preachers Pamphlet)
and another involving a division between both George Walker and Jack
Carroll,
the two overseers in the U.S.A. as to who would be 'Next Greatest
Amongst
Them,' it was decided that a world conference would be held in
England.
This was held at W. Haneys (England) on July 19, 20, 21, 1930.”
(Spiritual Fraud by Doug Parker)
A copy of a statement regarding the meeting agenda was circulated
afterwards
and is quoted below.
Statements about this meeting differ as to the location where the
meeting was held. Some state that it was at West Hanney; and others state (including The Secret Sect) incorrectly state that it was in the home of W. Haney. In
any event, the following statement obtained from another source is the
same as that printed in The Secret Sect, and the list of those present
is identical.
The convention shown as "Oxford" on the England convention list is held in the Village of West Hanney, which is located in the County of Oxfordshire. Other casual names for this convention are Berks, Berkshire West Hanney and Oxon. Due to boundary changes, West Hanney is now located in the County of Oxfordshire, formerly known as Berks (short for Berkshire, the county or region). The Village of Hanney split into East and West Hanney in the 1950's. Wantage is the nearest town and Oxford is the nearest city to the West Hanney convention. Regardless of how it is spelled, the statement circulated about the W. Hanney Conference quotes the same information as that printed in the Secret Sect, and the list of individuals present is identical in both statements.
It is fairly common knowledge that the relationship
between Jack Carroll and
George Walker was strained, and they are most likely the individuals
to which Doug Parker referred when he stated:
"The need for a determined and united policy was discussed at a conference held at W. Haney's home in England, 19-21 July, 1930. An attempt also was made to settle the strained relations between Walker and Carroll, but as no preacher emerged as outright leader, it became apparent that overseers retained and strengthened their right to exercise authority within their territories. Repetition of former policy was reflected in the statement issued by the seven senior workers after the meeting: July 20, 1930." ( The Secret Sect by Doug & Helen Parker, pp 82-83)
"In the American territories there was continuing antagonism between George Walker and Jack Carroll, as Irvine Weir discovered in 1935. A pioneer of the sect's mission in California, Weir asked George Walker to approve his plan to return to California but, to his amazement, the overseer turned to him and said, "I would not like you to go to California now. I am sorry but I may have to cut the West off. When he later travelled through the state of Colorado, Weir found that sect members in Denver had declared their support either for Jack Carroll or George Walker; the overseers each forbade visits or contacts with preachers who were loyal to his opponent. Although preachers had hoped for improved relations, after the 1930 conference, difficulties arose during the next two decades in different places and many became perplexed who once believed that harmony existed within the fellowship." ( The Secret Sect by Doug & Helen Parker, p 85)
Statement Re: Meeting at West Hanney (England)
July 20, 1930
"For a number of years past, difficulties have existed in the U.S.A. between some of the elder workers, which in recent years became more acute, because of these difficulties it was decided that a number of the elder workers from various countries should come together in England and enquire into the reasons for the trouble and seek to find some basis for a better understanding.
"During the days we (the undersigned) were gathered together, full opportunity was given to all to express their minds and to offer any suggestions that would be helpful. After considering the matter from every viewpoint, we are happy to say that those who were most concerned in this trouble expressed their deep regret for any offence at which they had been guilty and apologised to each other, and undertook to do all in their power to dispel the existing difficulties and promote the spirit of unity and fellowship amongst the Lord's people, particularly in the fields which were most affected by the trouble.
"It was unanimously agreed by all present that the past should be buried, and that in the future, all would use their influence to discourage anything that would disturb the peace in God's family, adhering to the teaching and example of Jesus. It was further agreed that should any violation or supposed violation occur, that no decision should be arrived at or circulated until the matter had been placed before a number of brethren from various countries."
Signed by the following:
W. J. Gill (Willie) 1900
G. Walker (George) 1899
J. T. Carroll (Jack) 1904
J. Hardie (John) 1900
A. Dougal (Alex)
H. R. Mathews (Hugh)1904
J. Twamley
J. Doak (John) 1903
W. Jamieson (Willie) 1905
A. Scott (S.)
J. Jardine (James)1904
J. S. Jackson (Jack) 1901
A. Pearce/Pierce 1904
W. Weir (Willie) 1903
W. Reid (Wilson) 1904
J. Forbes
(Jack)
The most famous line of the West Hanney Statement is:
"It was unanimously agreed by all present that the past should be buried...".
This line is often taken out of context to mean that the workers agreed to bury William Irvine's role in founding the 2x2 movement. To be fair, please read this statement again, very carefully. Notice the purpose for which the worldwide workers meeting was called at W. Haney. It was because "difficulties have existed in the U.S.A. between some of the elder workers..." The difficulty was was the strained relationship between the two U.S.A. overseer workers, Jack Carroll and George Walker. "The past" had nothing to do with hiding or burying the history of the 2x2 group. "The past" was the offenses or feud that existed between these two men. When two people "make up," it is often the case that they agree to "let by-gones be by-gones," and let the past go. The West Hanney statement was saying the same thing--that as far as these two men, "the past should be buried."
Go to Chapter 17
Go to Top of Page


Print this page
REPRESENTING THE LARGEST COLLECTION OF 2X2 HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS ON THE INTERNET


